Cletrac.org

Cletrac Tractor Discussion => HG, OC-3, OC-4 & General => Topic started by: Harvey Havens on July 30, 2002, 02:17:07 AM

Title: main spring
Post by: Harvey Havens on July 30, 2002, 02:17:07 AM
Is Hg's main springs different than the oc3 i have 4 from hg's and they seam to be smaller than the ones on the crawler  i'm working on the trac frames are the same need some help Harvey
Title: Spring
Post by: Crawler Boy on July 30, 2002, 09:45:04 AM
Yes the spring is diffrent between HG and
OC-3 it is stronger and bigger on OC-3
Title:
Post by: thecatskinner on July 30, 2002, 12:31:10 PM
I'm not certain this is an OC/Hg issue, though it may be.
There are two different springs shown in my book, and based on my own experience the stiffer springs were available before the OC-3.
Title:
Post by: thecatskinner on July 31, 2002, 03:31:17 AM
According to my parts book there was a "standard" and a "heavy duty" spring available that covered all serial numbers of 31, 60, and 68.  
The 42 used the same springs (both standard and heavy) up to serial number 52GA471.  A different spring was used for later 42s.
The part numbers are as follows:
Standard 112 529
Heavy 115 208 (Assy)
The later 42s: 117 024
I see no heavy springs listed for the later 42s.
Title:
Post by: Blake Malkamaki on July 31, 2002, 02:52:17 PM
I know one of the springs is enclosed and one is an open coil. I think some of the loaders did not have any spring - just a solid piece in place of the spring - I am not certain of this. I know a lot of the larger Cletrac loaders and dozers did not have springs.

Blake
Title:
Post by: thecatskinner on July 31, 2002, 11:10:32 PM
I checked the books again--both Parts and Instructions.  
Both the standard and heavy duty springs show a dust cover.  The cover for the HD seems more "robust" than the one on the standard.
However, I don't think the HG we had when I was a kid had dust covers and in fact in a number of the pictures in the manuals there are no dust covers on the springs.
Were the dust covers added at some point in time?  I can certainly imagine them becoming "optional" for a farmer after working on them, but the pictures in the manuals would not have under gone that type of "field modification".;);)